Back in August 2017, USA Today ran an article called “You will get chipped-eventually. And led in with a Wisconsin firm that was embedding microchips in employees to ditch company badges and corporate logons. The article stirred up quite the debate.
The article lists the pros of chipping as convenience. You will be able to pay with your chip, start your car with your chip, zip through airport scanners. However, what about the cons?
In the digital age privacy is already a concern with Alexa and your phone listening in to your conversations and serving you advertising based off of them. Building a digital profile of your consumer habits.
What happens if your chip gets hacked? And what about the GPS ramifications? Will you be a red blip on someone’s radar?
Fast-forward to today. And we look to Australia who is embracing micro-chipping. The campaign there, is to make chipping sound like you gain super human abilities. Now you can log into computers and turn on your lights with a wave of your hand. The tech is called “Opal” and is the size of a grain of rice. Opal can hold medical data in addition to car keys and financial data.
They call this bio-hacking. One of the interviewed “considered himself a guinea-pig for human augmentation.” He says “It’s given him the ability to communicate with machines. It’s literally integrated into who I am.”
I was in Germantown in Columbus, OH recently and stopped into a book store and was leafing through a book that was discussing the future of medicine.
It mentioned digital medicine and personalized medicine as the wave of the future.
Digital medicine is a category of pharmaceuticals that combines a prescription medicine with an ingestible sensor component that can connect to an app to monitor bodily functions in response to the medicine. Similar religious and ethical concerns surround this form of medicine to that of a chip implant. It will digitize your body and allows for breeches of privacy.
Proponents note that participation in digital medicine programs is voluntary and they comply with all applicable laws and standards.
Personalized medicine is tailoring medical treatments to patients based off of their genetic profiles. By building molecular profiles of individuals they hope to be able to cater treatments to the individual. And even be able to alter their DNA.
There was an article called “Protection Without a Vaccine,” that ran in The New York Times. The article explains that there is research being done that will allow synthetic genes to be delivered into muscles through a similar process to vaccination.
The first human trials for this preventative approach are under way. It would be considered gene therapy. Scientists would isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes would be placed into viruses and injected into human tissue. The viruses would invade human cells and the synthetic gene would incorporate into the recipients own DNA. If all goes well the new genes would instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.
Although the article doesn’t mention this, how did they stumble across the ability of a vaccination to be able to alter DNA?
Dr. Theresa Deisher Stanford Molecular Scientist can tell you. She found that the vaccines we are already using have the ability to alter our DNA.
Although you will likely not hear that from a doctor or the CDC.
There is no more denying the fact that fetal DNA is in vaccines and is used in medical testing, as Trump entered legislation trying to ban its use in federal testing.
Deisher’s letter to legislators said her research found that the fetal DNA fragments found in several of our vaccines have the ability to merge with and alter our DNA.
She goes on to explain that this DNA altering can account for autism, immune issues, and gender confusion.
Beyond Trump entering legislation to ban fetal testing which may not effect its use in vaccines, there hasn’t been any thing done with her findings. Well except adding a new use for vaccines to alter DNA intentionally without acknowledging it is already doing this.
The CDC has not commented on it. And our government is looking to make vaccinations mandatory across the board.
Unfortunately, our government has a poor track record with acknowledging the harm vaccinations can cause. Japan banned the whole cell pertussis vaccine a decade prior to the US after finding out it caused irreparable brain damage. How many people suffered from irreparable brain damage in the US in the decade it took them to follow Japan’s lead?
Japan stopped mandating the MMR in 1993 after finding it caused aseptic meningitis. That is the same vaccine they are forcing in this measles outbreak. A vaccine that is in court for fraudulently overstating its efficacy, that is for three viruses, not just measles and that was taken out of the vaccine schedule 26 years ago in Japan.
Japan when they stopped mandating vaccines before age 2 went from middle of the pack for infant mortality to best in the world. The US is worst out of all industrialized nations with thirty some nations above us. But we have the most aggressive vaccination policies. That is a problem.
In the article mentioned above, regarding digital medicine, proponents used the fact that it was voluntary in its defense. However, right now our rights to decline vaccinations are being taken away. How long will we have the right to decline digital medicine? And if it is recognized that it is only ethical if it is voluntary, then wouldn’t it stand to reason that making vaccination mandatory is unethical?
The Nuremburg Code which came out of WWII trials states that it is essential to have bodily autonomy and that medical interventions must be voluntarily consented to. Why is this code of ethics being dismissed now? We had an uptick of measles in 1990, 27,000 cases in the US that year, and the result was a booster because it was found immunity waned. Why now is it the removal of rights?
This is an industry that hasn’t had liability since 1986. That has grown into a power monster out spending oil and gas lobbyists 2 to 1. And there is a list of politicians on their pay roll. So instead of addressing concerns about DNA altering, under-reported side-effects, efficacy fraud, toxic ingredients they are using the government and measles to strip our rights to refuse their products.
They are coming out with products that knowingly will alter DNA, yet denying they have a product on the market that already has the ability to do so.
What would you call altering DNA? I would call it genetic modification. What have we found from genetically modifying our food? Why did we need to genetically modify our food in the first place? So we could use pesticides. What are we finding of the pesticides? They cause cancer. What are we finding of the genetically modified food? It is rife with cancer causing pesticides. AND animals do not want to eat it.
Deer when presented with GMO corn vs. non GMO corn will always go for the organic corn. Not just because of the pesticides. But because it tastes better. We are finding the same thing as the deer. Organic food is better.
So why would that reasoning not apply to us? Wouldn’t organic humans also be better?
If natural make-up free of toxins is better for our skin and make-up with toxins can have internal health implications. And we are pushing for natural, toxin free make-up. If we are pushing for more organic food. If we are pushing for aluminum free deodorant. Than why aren’t we ALL pushing for organic vaccinations. And the continued right to deny them.
And why is it that our consumer demand has created alternatives in all other fields except medicine?
Because they don’t have to, they can mandate them as is. We have no consumer voice in medicine. And soon we won’t have any choice.
If we have found that genetically modifying our food is not good for our food? Wouldn’t it stand to reason that genetically modifying ourselves isn’t either?
Well we have found that. It’s just not public knowledge because information like this is being censored.
Google is censoring information on glyphosate causing cancer.
Google is censoring information on vaccinations being harmful.
Why? Because these are cash cows for our country and our government stopped protecting the people in favor of protecting corporations a long time ago. Now they are being more blatant in their disregard for our opinion and our health than ever before.
One article looks to the future of the current medical freedom crisis we are in.
My article “Envision the Future” does it similarly.
However, John Rappoport takes it further into the details of genetic modification.
He predicts that the current mandatory vaccination laws, and predicted micro-chipping mandates are a premeditated pathway to genetic modification experiments. Where there will be sub-groups and class divisions.
I would argue there are already class divisions happening with parents of vaccine injured children being forced out of school systems, forced out of CA and NY, and now even some people being forced out of their jobs.
In Rappoports prediction, Group A would be injected with genes 1-6. Group B would be injected with Genes 7-12. Maybe one group would be genetically modified to be stronger. Maybe the other would be weaker.
With informed consent to medical treatments removed as California and New York have already done then we would have no control over which group of DNA we received.
He references a quote from Lee Silver a Princeton molecular biologist. “The GenRich will account for ten percent of the American population – will carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy are controlled by the GenRich class.”
“Naturals (unaltered humans) work as low-paid service providers or laborers. The GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed.”
“When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished but as the age when a plethora of new forms – some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two – burst onto the scene.”
I don’t know this Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, but I would venture a guess that he hasn’t been having many chats with the man upstairs. Because it is my belief that is not a future that God would look on approvingly.
I would however agree that the stage is already set for us to go there. Our rights are being dismissed, God is being written out of our country, the state is making medical decisions for us and we are losing medical freedom and bodily autonomy.
I strongly believe that God does not want us injecting ourselves with vaccines whose cell lines have been grown in either animal cells or aborted fetus cells.
“I praise you because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; your works are wonderful, I know that full well.” Psalm 139:14
I do not believe he made our immune systems incomplete so that we would need to be injected with animal and fetal DNA some day.
For those that would argue about how this God given miracle cured disease I would implore you to look at Scarlet Fever, Typhoid and TB that declined without widespread vaccination in the same rate and timeframe as measles and mumps and polio due largely to an infrastructure that included sanitation, nutrition and clean water. I would argue we are now keeping measles and mumps around and adding to it autism, immune disorders, gender confusion and cancer.
If vaccines ever were a gift from God, he has been entirely written out of it through ever-increasing corruption and greed, just as he is being written out of our country.
Vaccines that contain animal DNA have been found to be contaminated with animal viruses that can mutate our cells and cause cancer as found in the SV-40 court cases.
Vaccines that contain DNA fragments from fetal cells have been found to be able to merge with and alter our own DNA leading to immune issues, autism and gender confusion. Girls injected with boy DNA. Boys injected with girl DNA. And now they are pushing for vaccines that can alter our DNA to prevent disease.
If we have realized that beauty products rife with toxins, food rife with toxins are not good for us.
If we have realized that genetically modified food is not good for us.
And we are pushing for more natural alternatives to health.
If we are rejecting the 100 year old philosophy of diagnostics and engineered medicine because we have found it is limited and not healing us and we are seeking out alternative methods outside of the system, which are not covered by the system’s insurance.
If we are rejecting vaccination because they can alter our DNA and contain DNA of fetal cells or animal cells and are rife with toxins.
Then the only play the industry has left is force, censorship and removal of our rights.
If we want to bring God back into our country. We need to stop allowing our government to dismantle what our forefathers built. A country built on freedom.
I would argue that we have let science dictate right and wrong, to which it has no ability. Science is a man-made application. It is limited to the technology and thinking of the time. Our understanding of the human body is still limited. Therefore we should not and do not have the ability to play God.
To alter our DNA with synthetic or fetal or animal DNA, to inject our body with machine, is to allow the removal of our humanity. Is to genetically modify us out of a soul.
We have a medical system and government that is eroding rights in the name of health. When it is not an outcome they readily deliver.
More often than not our surgeries result in more surgeries. Our medicine results in more medicine. It is a system built on keeping us in it. A system built on profit. A system that profits off of us being sick. And acknowledges that the real beneficiaries are the stakeholders, not the patients.
Right now we can write our legislators and show up at rallies, but until we address the pathways for corruption that have gotten us here. Lobbyists, industry’s above liability and above consumer regulations, government officials being paid for their votes and letting corporations write their own legislation, which is including writing away our rights.
If playing by their terms doesn’t work, we need to play by the terms our forefathers protected, before there aren’t any rights left to fight for or with.
“The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.” – Thomas Jefferson
“We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion... Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.”-
“We hold it for a fundamental and inalienable truth that religion and the manner of discharging it can be directed only by reason and conviction not by force and violence. The religion, then, of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate.”
The Nuremberg Code
1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential.
This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.